Out of strength comes forth, er, strength

Grr! I don’t know what else to say. Thanks to the generosity and impeccable taste of Ms Baroque, I’ve received the award A Roar for Powerful Words, initiated by The Shameless Lions Writing Circle in recognition of powerful writing. Naturally, I’m privileged and flattered by the award, and also, oddly, emasculated, as though everything I’ll write from now on will be floppy and lamb-like and utterly unworthy. Such is honour.

And like most honours, it comes with strings attached. I have to: “list three things I believe are necessary for good, powerful writing; and then pass the award on to the five blogs I want to honour, who in turn pass it on to five others, etc etc.” Hmm. I’ll do my best.

Three necessary things (assuming that one has something to say) for good, powerful writing:

1. Experience of other people’s good, powerful writing. By which I mean that you shouldn’t just write, write, write, but read, read, read, read. Read.

2. The ability to revise, ruthlessly, and to listen to criticism (which doesn’t necessarily involve its blind acceptance).

3. An awareness that what you write might have weight, might hurt or flatter, or change someone’s day or invite response; in other words, that what you are doing is not solipsistic, but social, and consequential. Be brave, be honest, but listen.

Five blogs I’d like to honour? This is much easier:

Writing Neuroses
Vanessa Gebbie
David Isaak
Chancelucky
Fictionbitch

Go forth and multiply.

Posted in prize, writing | 4 Comments

War criminal bombs in China, seeks refuge in Vatican

If you’ve seen a British newspaper in the last couple of days, you can write this post yourself.

If you haven’t, just google Blair + China + Catholic.

And then move on. After all, isn’t that what Jesus would have done?

Posted in blair, vatican | 2 Comments

Taxonomies

Remember Dewey? The man who classified books in a meaningful way? (Because all taxonomies are meaningful.) Well… Browsing in the Wolverhampton branch of W.H. Smiths today, I noticed that the Biography section has a subsection entitled Tragic Life Stories – occupying, incidentally, slightly more than half of the section, for without tragedy we are nothing.

And there, among the various descendants of Angela’s Ashes, from Peltzer to whoever that man was who lied to Oprah and was subsequently execrated (A Thousand Pieces of Something? I honestly can’t remember), what did I find? David Blunkett (ex-Home Secretary) and Victoria Beckham (ex-Spice Girl).

What a fragile thing happiness is.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Camels

I have a thing about camels. I love their stoicism and superciliousness, as though their hump or humps contained not only life-maintaining fat but also life-enhancing forbearance. I have a small gold camel round my neck; I stroke it often, for inspiration. There are days, I admit it, when I aspire to camelhood.

So, I’m amused but also slightly hurt, to see that someone very important in Saudi Arabia has issued a fatwa (remember: short for fatuous waffle) against camel beauty contests. On the grounds that the camels, when asked what they most want, say “World peace”?

Posted in crank, fatwa, religion | 3 Comments

Mud

One of the saddest aspects of the way Silvio Berlusconi has skewed political and civil life in Italy is the arsenal he’s chosen to vilify and discredit his adversaries. As long as these are politicians it’s part and parcel – unfortunately – of the way debate is conducted here, in no small measure thanks to Berlusconi himself – surely the only national leader in the west who would claim that communists not only eat babies, but boil them first – and to the gaggle of publicists and lawyers he’s surrounded by, mud-slingers all. But his vulgar ad hominem attacks have also been directed at two men, both journalists, both now dead, whose professional behaviour was never less than impeccable and whose political positions were far closer to any normal idea of what a respectable centre (-right) might be than is Berlusconi’s own: Indro Montanelli and Enzo Biagi. By attacking these men, Berlusconi has shown his contempt for the principle of a free press.

Montanelli died in 2001. Fiercely anti-communist, critical of the Christian Democratic hegemony, the target of a knee-capping attack by the Red Brigades, Montanelli had worked for Corriere della Sera until it veered left, after which he edited Il Giornale. Heavily indebted, the paper was bought by Berlusconi in 1977. In 1993, when Forza Italia was founded, Berlusconi apparently turned up at the editorial offices and informed the staff that the paper would support his every political move. Montanelli resigned, accusing Berlusconi of being anti-democratic. Berlsuconi’s campaign of vilification began, and continued until the journalist’s death.

Enzo Biagi died yesterday, after a 60-year career as a journalist in print and, subsequently, television. Berlusconi was gunning for the man long before he officially entered politics, after Biagi questioned his financial links with Bettino Craxi, the then-head of the Socialist Party, so it wasn’t surprising that he should have included Biagi’s name in his famous Bulgarian edict against those who made a ‘criminal’ use of the television. A feature of totalitarianism – and advertising – is that things rarely do what it says on the tin. Indeed, as Orwell taught us, they tend to do the opposite. So it’s wryly amusing – the kind of humour Biagi most appreciated – that Berlusconi should regard Biagi as criminal. What is less amusing is that the journalist was profoundly hurt by the supine way in which Italian state television simply turned its back on him, and kept it turned. By the time Berlusconi was once more in opposition, Biagi was too ill to do more than make a token come-back to TV.

It isn’t just mud on Berlusconi’s hands.

Posted in berlusconi, information, italy, journalism, politics | 2 Comments

Good news

The website God Hates Fags has been down for the past few days. Let’s do all we can to keep it that way. In the meantime, read this interview with ‘pro-lifer’ Neal Horsley, who may not like abortions but isn’t averse to a touch of cross-species diddling.

And if you’re hungry for more, click here.

Posted in gay, homophobia, politics, religion | 3 Comments

Polls, suggestions for

After the phenomenal success of my toilet paper survey, I’m thinking about my next poll. I’m looking for something challenging, witty and, well, world-enhancing. A genuinely large question. And no filth.

Any ideas?

Leave a comment

Good riddance to…

…Don Oreste Benzi, the smarmy sanctimonious little twat priest who took it upon himself to conduct funeral services for foetuses, said that scantily-dressed women had only themselves to blame if they were raped, pestered sex workers with his medieval twaddle about redemption (his greatest publicity stunt was to get JP2 to kiss a Nigerian prostitute with AIDS) and had this to say about homosexuality:

«Le relazioni omosessuali sono contro natura e sono nocive al Bene della società… L’omosessualità è una deviazione. Se uno non lo cura è un vizio… (translation: Homosexual relationships are against nature and damage society. Homosexuality is a deviation. If it isn’t treated it becomes a vice).


If you speak Italian, you might find this interview instructive. http://www.youtube.com/v/BuN0aKm6CDs&rel=1

Posted in church, good riddance, homophobia | 2 Comments

THE GOLDEN FLEECE

This is the third section in the sequence of poems dedicated to the Golden Fleece. If you want to know what happened earlier, click on one and two.

CHIRON


1

They’re pushing and shoving to get through

the gate, where darkness appears to be

calling the numbers out. He rides

in a Ferris wheel, wearing the hats of his

numerous god-like fathers. Erotic blockades

slow them all down for a second’s

check on the purchase of their sexuality

and they’re off! harried by waves

into lines of hysterical

bunting above the judges.


A scent of madness

is one thing they share with

the mythic world, which is perhaps

eager to see them gone. It walks

towards an open window without flinching

at the word ‘outside’.

Those waters run deep.

They have, it would seem, been somewhere else

and to drink

is to be alone with them.

To be alone

is one way of living with darkness.

To live with darkness

is one way of counting the flags in the breeze.


And then the breeze drops and the flags are still.


2

It does not always want to be heard.

We extend the untended colonies

just as the travellers

hung in suspension

like an uncut coil of piston rings

will spiral down a staircase

to possess the earth.

And isn’t that

the kind of spiritual miscarriage

only a man with imagination could father,

his long-range devices scattered

across a favourite landscape

whose colour is local to itself. Nostalgic barque.

The fruit of the pine.

This is where nothing need be named.


3

The least confusing thing

opens the voice to boredom and so the voice

becomes desperate, at times confused,

seeming to shut itself out of whatever is

likely to happen. As though I were on the point of

telling you a story about yourself

that has barely begun or describing the room

in which you read

or inventing a language whose logic

would be glass-like and open

onto a brighter garden than the one you know.

All that could be done. Like plaiting strands of

maidenhair

or waiting for the wind to lift or crawling

through the mouth of a cave towards the sound of

falling water and an unexpected, unwanted light.

Anything that doesn’t hurt is transparent

as finding an old

unanswered letter from someone who

signs himself ‘J’. A story

that does not ask to be told. All of its

trickily-guarded secrets are realised before the end.

It makes up a bed in the guest-room for the voice,

flirting before it dies.


4

Love becomes local and woven

into the webbing as dark wings

cover the cathedral square.

I think I am shelling peanuts

or leaving the floor to be cleaned

by someone else as a part of me

scrapes the earth and a part

of me dreams one plausible

end after another. Hopeless

languages are house guests here,

waiting to be entertained with

wine that loosens the tongue as a

prelude to the bird’s vain

silvery gift on your shoulder.


5

Nothing to be done to protect oneself from that

danger, I told him. He listened

as one listens to wind make small talk out of empty

withdrawing hours. The weight of a slow and reluctant

withdrawal into space,

out of the body, into the space of my own. Nothing

can be done. Do everything, emulate

everything. The weight of the city is only partly

disguised by its crimson balloon-like walls

and the voices you hear are truly the voices of

wanting to be possessed. The sadness and evasions

vanish or become

a crueller, more substantial element

than you are used to,

and what is left you can be had.

What wants to be possessed is soft and heavy

as soaking cloth or the terrible lack of

colour inside the body

and the bands that herald darkness are coming soon.


6

One day I shall be taken

into that darkness, and left with the drum.

I shall hold out my arms to be written on,

waking to silence.

This will happen

and no way of talking about it now

can stop me taking the slips,

unfolding them, calling the numbers out,

assigning them each to each.


But the events call out their own,

are pushy like people who make it

in small boats off the cold, unpopulated

coast, or lean on the rails of liners

staring down. The several skins

hold everything, howling, at bay as

small waves eat the moon.

Posted in golden fleece, poem, value | Leave a comment

The Scent of Cinnamon: sixth review

Another review that takes a look at a few of the O. Henry Prize stories (including mine!) can be found here. It comes from Inside Bay Area.

Posted in review, the scent of cinnamon | Leave a comment